Home / Head-to-head
Babolat Technical Veron 3.0 vs Bullpadel Hack 04
The Babolat Technical Veron 3.0 and Bullpadel Hack 04 sit in almost the same price band, but they take opposite approaches to building a power racket: a single stiff EVA core on the Veron against a three-layer rigid-soft-rigid sandwich on the Hack.
Weight and balance are close (360 g vs 370–375 g, both high balance), so this comparison comes down almost entirely to how each core is built. Babolat states the Veron's Black EVA core plainly as a stiff structure — power through directness. Bullpadel's MultiEVA on the Hack layers a softer core between two rigid outer layers, aiming for power with a touch more give on contact.
Neither approach is objectively superior — it's a genuine feel preference. Players who like knowing exactly where the ball went the instant they hit it tend to prefer the Veron's directness; players who want some of that shock absorbed before it reaches the arm tend to prefer the Hack's sandwich construction.
| Babolat Technical Veron 3.0 | Bullpadel Hack 04 2026 | |
|---|---|---|
| shape | diamond | diamond |
| weight | 360 g | 370 g |
| balance | high | high |
| feel | hard | hard |
| € | premium | premium |
Babolat Technical Veron 3.0
- shape
- diamond
- weight
- 360 g
- balance
- high
- feel
- hard
premium
Bullpadel Hack 04 2026
- shape
- diamond
- weight
- 370 g
- balance
- high
- feel
- hard
premium
Try to hit with both if you can — this is one of the few match-ups on this site where the spec sheet alone won't settle it for you.
Price links coming soon — we're finishing our comparison data.
FAQ
Which core construction is easier on the arm?
The layered, rigid-soft-rigid construction (like the Hack's) generally absorbs more shock than a single-density stiff core (like the Veron's), though neither is a substitute for a genuinely soft-core racket if arm comfort is your priority.